It’s apparent why they wished Garland on SCOTUS so unhealthy. He’s a rubber stamp on no matter bull the liberals need to cram down America’s throat. That’s how he’ll be as Legal professional Normal, too. A private valet.
Like Leahy by accident spilled the beans about immediately, the Democrats have a singular agenda merchandise over the subsequent 4 years: “rooting out hate.” Like Massive Tech’s “incitement” agenda, the aim of the nebulous terminology is to provide them a clean test to remove their opponents on the fitting as soon as and perpetually.
Garland said yesterday he would prosecute the “white supremacists” who attacked the capitol on January sixth. That’s the overarching “hate” narrative that Leahy was calling on this morning in his remarks. It’s what each Democrat retains saying. The reason being apparent: they slender it right down to this one time period, which is a time period they management the definition for. They name Gina Carano a white supremacist you assume they received’t apply it to whoever the hell they need?
And so they need to disarm you, too, and Garland is A-OK with that one, as properly, as he demonstrated with his answer to Mike Lee asking about Biden eager to ban AR-15s.
Throughout his marketing campaign, Biden vowed to ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, pushing common background checks on gun patrons, and holding gun producers answerable for misuse of their merchandise. So, Lee requested Garland’s view on every of these.
“As I’m certain you recognize, the president is a robust supporter of gun management and has been an advocate for all of his life,” Garland informed Lee. “The position of the Justice Division is to advance the coverage program of the administration so long as it’s in step with the regulation.”
When Lee requested if Garland helps banning sure forms of firearms, he responded, “The place there may be room below the regulation for the president’s insurance policies to be pursued, then I feel the president is entitled to pursue them.”
When Lee requested if Garland helps common background checks, he stated he helps checks to permit individuals legally entitled to purchase weapons to acquire them — but additionally to ban gross sales to these “we’re involved about as a result of they’re a menace, as a result of they’re felons, or for no matter cause, [are] barred by the regulation” from shopping for them.
When Lee requested if Garland would help holding gun producers answerable for accidents or deaths brought on by their firearms, the nominee stated that whereas the president could have pushed that, “I’ve not thought myself deeply about this. I don’t assume it raises a Second Modification concern.”
“For no matter cause” is a good line. You already stated “no matter” cause. So did Leahy. It’s no matter cause you make up.
Welcome to Biden’s America, of us. Should you can name it America, when he’s by way of with it.