The rise (and success) of President Donald Trump and the menace his tens of tens of millions of supporters pose to the prevailing institution order (the deep state) is so immense there’s a motion afoot by the powers that be to get rid of them earlier than they develop robust and arranged sufficient to take America again.
One of many methods this effort is taking form is to easily designate Trump’s supporters, amongst them People who stay skeptical of vaccines, as “extremist” teams, enemies of the state and terrorists.
As Massive Pharma — bolstered by the previous president’s COVID-19 vaccine push — grows in wealth and energy, the trade is emulating Company America and Massive Tech by rising nearer to the leviathan federal authorities.
As famous by Technocracy News, final month The Hill claimed the “anti-vaccination motion sees COVID-19 as a possibility” to shore up its opposition, including: As public well being officers search to reassure People on the security and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, anti-vaccine efforts may stop the nation from reaching herd immunity.”
In the meantime, a separate report in The Instances stated the British “authorities regards tackling false details about COVID-19 vaccination as a rising precedence,” possible for the exact same concern.
And but, how do ‘democracies’ justify using cyber warfare towards residents simply to implement public well being insurance policies that not all might agree with (and positively insurance policies that ‘the science’ doesn’t all the time show)?
Aren’t considerations over the security of vaccines official? Ought to they not be a part of the coverage debate and dialogue? Since when is it okay to impose unsure wholesome insurance policies on supposedly free folks the identical method a dictatorial chief would? (Associated: After abandoning objective science and endorsing left-wing political agendas, how is the Lancet still considered a medical journal?)
Not if the target, the actual goal, is management over the inhabitants; when management is the overriding objective, then dialogue is an obstacle.
And alongside these traces, ‘opponents’ to authorities coverage — on this case, when governments have determined that ‘vaccines are good’ and ‘dissent to vaccines is dangerous,’ the powers that be then should not merely disagree with their opponents, they should demonize, dehumanize and de-legitimize them, even when it means placing their lives at risk with false accusations of “extremism.”
Take into account, per Technocracy Information:
In July 2020, Imran Ahmed, a member of the Steering Committee on Countering Extremism Pilot Job Pressure beneath the British authorities’s Fee for Countering Extremism and the chief govt of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), advised The Impartial he considers anti-vaxxers “an extremist group that pose a nationwide safety threat,” as a result of “as soon as somebody has been uncovered to 1 kind of conspiracy it’s simple to steer them down a path the place they embrace extra radical world views that may result in violent extremism.”
Who thinks like this? Authoritarians do. Dictators. Tyrants. There may be completely nothing to hyperlink concern over vaccines to violent extremism. Nothing.
However the identical form of tyranny is brewing within the ‘land of the free’ — throughout the pond in America.
Earlier than President Trump even boarded Air Pressure One out of D.C., Democrats and their sick, twisted media lapdogs started fantasizing about “deprogramming” his 74 million-plus supporters by sending all of them to ‘reeducation camps’ to allow them to indoctrinate them again into the Biden/Democrat/Deep State fold.
A few of them have really stated as a lot out loud, together with Marxist-Anarchist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The New York Post reported:
Ocasio-Cortez stated the Home subcommittee on civil rights she serves on has held hearings over the prior two years on white supremacy and stated there are packages to “de-radicalize” brain-washed adherents.
However she stated funding was not a precedence for these packages in the course of the Trump years.
“There are people who find themselves radicalized proper now. It’s going to take a really very long time to de-radicalize these folks and a number of effort,” she stated.
Just some years in the past, she would have been run out of Congress for saying issues like that. Now, post-Trump, she not solely will get away with it, she is widely known for it and her ideas are echoed throughout different platforms — together with so-called “information” networks like CNN, whose ‘media watchdog’ doesn’t even push again on calls to censor opponents.
See extra at Vaccines.news.